Soft symmetric difference complement-union product of groups

Authors

https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.vi.64

Abstract

Soft set theory, recognized for its mathematical precision and algebraic capabilities, offers a strong framework for tackling uncertainty, ambiguity, and variability influenced by parameters. This research introduces a novel binary operation known as the soft symmetric difference complement-union product, which is defined for soft sets with parameter domains that exhibit a group-theoretic structure. Based on a solid axiomatic foundation, this operation is demonstrated to satisfy key algebraic properties such as closure, associativity, commutativity, and idempotency, while also being consistent with broader notions of soft equality and subset relationships.  It is obtained that the proposed product is a noncommutative semigroup in the collections of soft sets with a fixed parameter set.The study provides an in-depth analysis of the operation's features concerning identity and absorbing elements, as well as its interactions with null and absolute soft sets, all within the framework of group-parameterized domains. The findings suggest that this operation establishes a coherent and structurally robust algebraic system, thereby enhancing the algebraic framework of soft set theory. Furthermore, this research sets the stage for the development of a generalized soft group theory, where soft sets indexed by group-based parameters emulate classical group behaviors through abstract soft operations. The operation's full integration within soft inclusion hierarchies and its compatibility with generalized soft equalities highlight its theoretical importance and broaden its potential applications in formal decision-making and algebraic modeling under uncertainty.

Keywords:

Soft sets, Soft subsets, Soft equalities, Soft symmetric difference complement-union

References

  1. [1] Zadeh, L. A. (1965). Fuzzy sets. Information and control, 8(3), 338–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0019-9958(65)90241-X
  2. [2] Molodtsov, D. (1999). Soft set theory—first results. Computers & mathematics with applications, 37(4-5), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(99)00056-5
  3. [3] Maji, P. K., Biswas, R., & Roy, A. R. (2003). Soft set theory. Computers & mathematics with applications, 45(4-5), 555-562. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0898-1221(03)00016-6
  4. [4] Pei, D., & Miao, D. (2005). From soft sets to information systems. In 2005 IEEE international conference on granular computing (Vol. 2, pp. 617-621). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/GRC.2005.1547365
  5. [5] Ali, M. I., Feng, F., Liu, X., Min, W. K., & Shabir, M. (2009). On some new operations in soft set theory. Computers & mathematics with applications, 57(9), 1547-1553. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.11.009
  6. [6] Yang, C. F. (2008). A note on “soft set theory”[comput. math. appl. 45 (4–5)(2003) 555–562]. Computers & mathematics with applications, 56(7), 1899-1900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2008.03.019
  7. [7] Feng, F., Li, C., Davvaz, B., & Ali, M. I. (2010). Soft sets combined with fuzzy sets and rough sets: A tentative approach. Soft computing, 14(9), 899–911. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0465-6
  8. [8] Singh, D., & Onyeozili, I. A. (2012). Notes on soft matrices operations. ARPN journal of science and technology, 2(9), 861–869. http://www.ejournalofscience.org
  9. [9] Zhu, P., & Wen, Q. (2013). Operations on soft sets revisited. Journal of applied mathematics, 2013(1), 105752. https://doi.org/10.1155/2013/105752
  10. [10] Sen, J. (2014). On algebraic structure of soft sets. Annals of fuzzy mathematics and informatics, 7(6), 1013–1020. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Jayanta-Sen/publication/317004556_On_algebraic_structure_of_soft_sets/links/5922e2ea458515e3d408d838/On-algebraic-structure-of-soft-sets.pdf
  11. [11] Sezgin, A., & Atagün, A. O. (2011). On operations of soft sets. Computers & mathematics with applications, 61(5), 1457–1467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.01.018
  12. [12] Stojanović, N. (2021). A new operation on soft sets:extended symmetric difference of soft sets. Vojnotehnički glasnik/military technical courier, 69(4), 779–791. https://doi.org/10.5937/vojtehg69-33655
  13. [13] Sezgin, A., Çağman, N., Atagün, A. O., & Aybek, F. N. (2023). Complemental binary operations of sets and their application to group theory. Matrix science mathematic, 7(2), 114–121. https://doi.org/10.26480/msmk.02.2023.114.121
  14. [14] Sezgin, A., & Dagtoros, K. (2023). Complementary soft binary piecewise symmetric difference operation: A novel soft set operation. Scientific journal of mehmet akif ersoy university, 6(2), 31–45. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sjmakeu/issue/82332/1365021
  15. [15] Sezgin, A., & Çalişici, H. (2024). A comprehensive study on soft binary piecewise difference operation. Eskişehir teknik üniversitesi bilim ve teknoloji dergisi b - teorik bilimler, 12(1), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.20290/estubtdb.1356881
  16. [16] Sezgin, A., & Yavuz, E. (2024). Soft binary piecewise plus operation: A new type of operation for soft sets. Uncertainty discourse and applications, 1(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.v1i1.26
  17. [17] Sezgin, A., & Şenyiğit, E. (2025). A new product for soft sets with its decision-making: Soft star-product. Big data and computing visions, 5(1), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.22105/bdcv.2024.492834.1221
  18. [18] Jiang, Y., Tang, Y., Chen, Q., Wang, J., & Tang, S. (2010). Extending soft sets with description logics. Computers & mathematics with applications, 59(6), 2087–2096. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2009.12.014
  19. [19] Sezgin, A., & Demirci, A. M. (2023). A new soft set operation: complementary soft binary piecewise star (*) operation. Ikonion journal of mathematics, 5(2), 24–52. https://doi.org/10.54286/ikjm.1304566
  20. [20] Ali, M. I., Shabir, M., & Naz, M. (2011). Algebraic structures of soft sets associated with new operations. Computers and mathematics with applications, 61(9), 2647–2654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.03.011
  21. [21] Neog, T. J., & Sut, D. K. (2011). A new approach to the theory of soft sets. International journal of computer applications, 32(2), 1–6. https://d1wqtxts1xzle7.cloudfront.net/53823653/2011-new_approach_soft_set-libre.pdf?1499755677=&response-content-disposition=inline%3B+filename%3DA_New_Approach_to_the_Theory_of_Soft_Set.pdf&Expires=1740299428&Signature=abUw8rHu4pPoWo9GGYn8lFITB64pDE61N9d
  22. [22] Li, F. (2011). Notes on the soft operations. ARPN journal of systems and software, 1(6), 205–208. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=5e028fe2a1df00303f8012ac465fa114611788d5
  23. [23] Ge, X., & Yang, S. (2011). Investigations on some operations of soft sets. World academy of science, engineering and technology, 51, 1112–1115. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=0f185b915f3223c39847c632a2ea34d1e64a0083
  24. [24] Singh, D., & Onyeozili, I. A. (2012). Some conceptual misunderstandings of the fundamentals of soft set theory 1 1. ARPN journal of systems and software, 2(9), 251–254. https://faculty.alfaisal.edu/gksing/publications/some-conceptual-misunderstandings-of-the-fundamentals-of-soft-set-theory
  25. [25] Professor D. Singh, P. D. S. (2012). Some results on distributive and absorption properties of soft operations. IOSR journal of mathematics, 4(2), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.9790/5728-0421830
  26. [26] Singh, D., & A. Onyeozili, I. (2012). On some new properties of soft set operations. International journal of computer applications, 59(4), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.5120/9538-3975
  27. [27] Qin, K., & Hong, Z. (2010). On soft equality. Journal of computational and applied mathematics, 234(5), 1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cam.2010.02.028
  28. [28] Jun, Y. B., & Yang, X. (2011). A note on the paper “combination of interval-valued fuzzy set and soft set” [Comput. Math. Appl. 58 (2009) 521527]. Computers and mathematics with applications, 61(5), 1468–1470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2010.12.077
  29. [29] Liu, X., Feng, F., & Jun, Y. B. (2012). A note on generalized soft equal relations. Computers and mathematics with applications, 64(4), 572–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.camwa.2011.12.052
  30. [30] Feng, F., & Li, Y. (2013). Soft subsets and soft product operations. Information sciences, 232, 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2013.01.001
  31. [31] Abbas, M., Ali, B., & Romaguera, S. (2014). On generalized soft equality and soft lattice structure. Filomat, 28(6), 1191–1203. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1406191A
  32. [32] Abbas, M., Ali, M. I., & Romaguera, S. (2017). Generalized operations in soft set theory via relaxed conditions on parameters. Filomat, 31(19), 5955–5964. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1719955A
  33. [33] Al-Shami, T. M. (2019). Investigation and corrigendum to some results related to g-soft equality and g f-soft equality relations. Filomat, 33(11), 3375–3383. https://www.jstor.org/stable/27382788
  34. [34] Alshami, T., & El-Shafei, M. (2020). $ T $-soft equality relation. Turkish journal of mathematics, 44(4), 1427–1441. https://doi.org/10.3906/mat-2005-117
  35. [35] Çağman, N., & Enginoğlu, S. (2010). Soft set theory and uni--int decision making. European journal of operational research, 207(2), 848–855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2010.05.004
  36. [36] Sezgin Sezer, A. (2012). A new view to ring theory via soft union rings, ideals and bi-ideals. Knowledge-based systems, 36, 300–314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.knosys.2012.04.031
  37. [37] Sezgin, A. (2016). A new approach to semigroup theory I: Soft union semigroups, ideals and bi-ideals. Algebra letters, 2016(3), 1–46. https://scik.org/index.php/abl/article/view/2989
  38. [38] Mustuoglu, E., Sezgin, A., & Kaya, Z. (2016). Some characterizations on soft uni-groups and normal soft uni-groups. International journal of computer applications, 155(10), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5120/ijca2016912412
  39. [39] Kaygisiz, K. (2012). On soft int-groups. Annals of fuzzy mathematics and informatics, 4(2), 365–375. http://www.afmi.or.kr@fmihttp//www.kyungmoon.com
  40. [40] Sezer, A. S., Agman, N., Atagün, A. O., Ali, M. I., & Turkmen, E. (2015). Soft intersection semigroups, ideals and bi-ideals; a new application on semigroup theory I. Filomat, 29(5), 917–946. https://doi.org/10.2298/FIL1505917S
  41. [41] Sezgin, A., Çağman, N., & Atagün, A. O. (2017). A completely new view to soft intersection rings via soft uni-int product. Applied soft computing journal, 54, 366–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2016.10.004
  42. [42] Sezgin, A., Durak, İ., & Ay, Z. (2025). Some new classifications of soft subsets and soft equalities with soft symmetric difference-difference product of groups. Amesia, 6(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.54559/amesia.1730014
  43. [43] Khan, A., Izhar, M., & Sezgin, A. (2017). Characterizations of abel grassmann’s groupoids by the properties of their double-framed soft ideals. International journal of analysis and applications, 15(1), 62–74. http://www.etamaths.com
  44. [44] Atagün, A. O., & Sezer, A. S. (2015). Soft sets, soft semimodules and soft substructures of semimodules. Mathematical sciences letters, 4(3), 235–242. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aslihan-Sezgin-2/publication/308938491_Soft_sets_soft_semi-modules_and_soft_substructures_of_semi-modules/links/57fc913f08ae329c3d498c89/Soft-sets-soft-semi-modules-and-soft-substructures-of-semi-modules.pdf
  45. [45] Sezer, A. S., Atagün, A. O., & Cagman, N. (2014). N-group SI-action and its applications to N-group theory. Fasciculi mathematici, 54, 139–153. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aslihan-Sezgin-2/publication/263651539_N-group_SI-action_and_its_application_to_N-group_theory/links/54353a080cf2bf1f1f283279/N-group-SI-action-and-its-application-to-N-group-theory.pdf
  46. [46] Atagün, A. O., & Sezgin, A. (2017). Int-soft substructures of groups and semirings with applications. Applied mathematics and information sciences, 11(1), 105–113. https://doi.org/10.18576/amis/110113
  47. [47] Gulistan, M., Feng, F., Khan, M., & Sezgin, A. (2018). Characterizations of right weakly regular semigroups in terms of generalized cubic soft sets. Mathematics, 6(12), 293. https://doi.org/10.3390/math6120293
  48. [48] Sezgin Sezer, A., Atagün, A. O., & Çağman, N. (2013). A new view to n-group theory: Soft N-groups. Fasciculi mathematici, 51(51), 123–140. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Aslihan-Sezgin-2/publication/263651532_A_new_view_to_N-group_theory-Soft_N-groups/links/0046353b68f17da045000000/A-new-view-to-N-group-theory-Soft-N-groups.pdf
  49. [49] Jana, C., Pal, M., Karaaslan, F., & Sezgin, A. (2019). (α, β)-soft intersectional rings and ideals with their applications. New mathematics and natural computation, 15(2), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1142/S1793005719500182
  50. [50] Atagun, A. O., Kamaci, H., Tastekin, I., & Sezgin, A. (2019). P-properties in Near-rings. Journal of mathematical and fundamental sciences, 51(2), 152–167. https://dx.doi.org/10.5614/j.math.fund.sci.2019.51.2.5
  51. [51] Sezgin, A., & Orbay, M. (2022). Analysis of semigroups with soft intersection ideals. Acta universitatis sapientiae, mathematica, 14(1), 166–210. https://doi.org/10.2478/ausm-2022-0012
  52. [52] Atagün, A. O., & Sezgin, A. (2018). A new view to near-ring theory: soft near-rings. South east asian journal of mathematics & mathematical sciences, 14(3). https://rsmams.org/journals/articleinfo.php?articleid=313&tag=seajmams
  53. [53] Manikantan, T., Ramasamy, P., & Sezgin, A. (2023). Soft Quasi-ideals of soft near-rings. Sigma, 41(3), 565–574. https://doi.org/10.14744/sigma.2023.00062
  54. [54] Sezgin, A., Çağman, N., & Çıtak, F. (2019). α-inclusions applied to group theory via soft set and logic. Communications faculty of sciences university of ankara series a1 mathematics and statistics, 68(1), 334–352. https://doi.org/10.31801/cfsuasmas.420457
  55. [55] Muhammad Riaz, M. Ozair. Ahmad, & Khalid Naeem. (2017). Novel concepts of soft sets with applications. Annals of fuzzy mathematics and informatics, 13(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.30948/afmi.2017.13.2.239
  56. [56] Sezgin, A., Yavuz, E., & Özlü, Ş. (2024). Insight into soft binary piecewise lambda operation: A new operation for soft sets. Journal of umm al-qura university for applied sciences, 1(1), 79–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43994-024-00187-1
  57. [57] Memiş, S. (2022). Another view on picture fuzzy soft sets and their product operations with soft decision-making. Journal of new theory, (38), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.53570/jnt.1037280
  58. [58] Sezgin, A., & Ilgin, A. (2024). Soft intersection almost subsemigroups of semigroups. International journal of mathematics and physics, 15(1), 13–20. https://doi.org/10.26577/ijmph.2024v15i1a2
  59. [59] Sezgi̇N, A., Atagün, A. O., & Cagan, N. (2025). A complete study on and-product of soft sets. Sigma journal of engineering and natural sciences, 43(1), 1-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/sigma/issue/91176/1661181

Downloads

Published

2025-06-17

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Uncertainty Discourse and Applications

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Ay, Z. ., & Sezgin , A. . (2025). Soft symmetric difference complement-union product of groups. Uncertainty Discourse and Applications, 2(2), 146-157. https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.vi.64

Similar Articles

11-20 of 22

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.