Research Article

Scenario quantile predictive control of bioreactor cultivation under kinetic parameter uncertainty

Authors

  • Tarek Abdelrahman Department of Electrical Power and Machines Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Ain Shams University, Cairo, Egypt.
  • Wolfgang H. Müller Department of Computer Science, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany.
  • Arafa Abdelzaher Nasef * Department of Engineering, Kafrelsheikh University, Egypt.

https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.v3i4.117

Abstract

Bioreactor feeding requires a balance between product formation, substrate limits, and uncertain kinetics. This study examines an empirical scenario-quantile model predictive controller that constrains an order statistic of predicted substrate concentrations and adds a quadratic exceedance penalty. The reported simulation campaign uses a constant-volume, three-state continuous-culture surrogate with Monod growth, product inhibition, Luedeking–Piret product formation, and six lognormally dispersed kinetic parameters. Thirty parameter draws crossed with five process-noise seeds give 150 paired runs per controller. The proposed controller has a reported final titer of 5.049 ± 1.593 g/L and a pooled step violation frequency of 4.9%, compared with 2.788 ± 1.130 g/L for Open-Loop (OL) nominal optimization, 4.798 ± 1.516 g/L for Proportional–Integral (PI) control, 4.913 ± 1.506 g/L for fixed-margin  Model Predictive Control (MPC), 5.044 ± 1.545 g/L for nominal MPC, and 5.059 ± 1.576 g/L for hard-scenario MPC. The hard-scenario controller has fewer observed violations, while an 80/90/95% order-statistic ablation changes violation frequencies from 7.9% to 2.9% with small mean-titer differences. These observations support a tunable empirical risk mechanism at the tested scale. They establish neither a finite-sample chance-constraint guarantee nor a joint batch safety guarantee. Inference, changing-volume fed-batch dynamics, and structural model error remain outside the executed comparison; the nested simulation design also limits interpretation of the reported run-level significance tests.     

Keywords

Empirical quantile control Model predictive control Kinetic parameter uncertainty Continuous culture Scenario optimization Bioprocess simulation
References (22)
  1. [1] Monod, J. (1949). The growth of bacterial cultures. Annual Review of Microbiology, 3, 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.mi.03.100149.002103

  2. [2] Andrews, J. F. (1968). A mathematical model for the continuous culture of microorganisms utilizing inhibitory substrates. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 10(6), 707–723. https://doi.org/10.1002/bit.260100602

  3. [3] Banga, J. R., Balsa-Canto, E., Moles, C. G., & Alonso, A. A. (2005). Dynamic optimization of bioprocesses: Efficient and robust numerical strategies. Journal of Biotechnology, 117(4), 407–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiotec.2005.02.013

  4. [4] Mayne, D. Q., Rawlings, J. B., Rao, C. V, & Scokaert, P. O. M. (2000). Constrained model predictive control: Stability and optimality. Automatica, 36(6), 789–814. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0005-1098(99)00214-9

  5. [5] Mesbah, A. (2016). Stochastic model predictive control: An overview and perspectives for future research. IEEE Control Systems Magazine, 36(6), 30–44. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCS.2016.2602087

Article Metrics

How to Cite

Abdelrahman, T., Müller, W. H., & Nasef, A. A. (2026). Scenario quantile predictive control of bioreactor cultivation under kinetic parameter uncertainty. Uncertainty Discourse and Applications, 3(4), 307-319. https://doi.org/10.48313/uda.v3i4.117

Similar Articles

1-10 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.